text size

Top comments

{{ annotation.praises_count }} Likes
{{ annotation.creator_alias }}
{{ annotation.creator_score }}

There are no comments yet. Be the first to start comment or request an explanation.

**By Rabbi Yisroel C. Blumenthal (edited version)** **** **FOCUS** **** Both Judaism and Christianity are belief systems. Each has its own way of looking at the world. These two systems are fundamentally different from each other. Only one of these systems can be correct. Judaism and Christianity are mutually exclusive. The foundations of Judaism are the events of the exodus and the revelation at Sinai. These established the relationship that the Jewish people have with God. These events established the credibility of Moses as God’s prophet. The Jewish people worship the God which revealed Himself to them at Sinai. The Jewish people follow the teachings of Moses, the prophet of God. The Jews of all generations accept this belief system based on the testimony of their parents. A Jew is born into a nation which worships the God of Sinai, and which lives by the teachings of Moses. It is through the testimony of his nation that the Jew learns the belief system which is Judaism. Christianity has a dual foundation. First, Christianity believes in the prophets of Jewish scripture. The second foundation of Christianity is the life and teachings of Jesus. The Jewish prophets are the ones who proclaimed that the Messiah is to come, and Jesus supposedly came and fulfilled that prophecy. The miracles that the Christian scriptures claim were performed by Jesus, establish the credibility of Jesus and his message. The person of Jesus is worshipped by Christians as a god, and the teachings of Jesus form the belief system which is Christianity. Christians of all generations accept this belief system based on the testimony of the Christian scriptures. These two belief systems clash on several fundamental points. From the Jewish perspective, the important differences between the two belief systems relate to the nature of God, and to the teachings of Moses. 1. Who is God? Jews believe that God is not a physical being, nor can God be represented by a physical being. God is not constrained by time or space. God is all powerful and all knowing. God is one. The Jewish belief about the oneness of God is described by the term “absolute unity”. This means that any plural number cannot be used in describing the essence of God. This is the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. This is the God who spoke to His people at Sinai. The focus of Judaism is on God. The life of the Jew is devoted to this God. Christianity worships Jesus. Christianity believes that god is one at the same time that he is three. The Christian god consists of the father (who roughly parallels the Jewish God), Jesus, and the holy ghost. These three are considered by the Christian to be coequal members of the godhead. The focus of Christianity is on Jesus. The life of the Christian is devoted to Jesus. 2. What are the teachings of Moses? Judaism believes that the law of Moses is a living law. It is a law which can, and should be followed by a nation. A nation which includes all types of people. The law of Moses is applicable in all generations, and in all situations. The full teachings of Moses include more than that which is written in the five books of Moses. The five books of Moses only contain the general structure of the law. Moses also taught the definition of the law. These teachings of Moses which clarify the law were not recorded in the five books, but rather, these were retained in the collective memory of the nation. As a static body of law the teachings of Moses require living people to apply it to practical life. Moses taught the nation the methods they are to use in order to render the law applicable to every situation. When a Jew does not know how to apply the law to a particular situation, he consults with the teachers who are familiar with the methods of application which were taught by Moses. The Jew finds practical guidance for daily life within the law of Moses. Christianity does not recognize any teachings of Moses which are not recorded in the five books. Christianity rejects the Jewish testimony which pertains to the practical application of the law. Christianity believes that many of the scriptural teachings of Moses are no longer relevant. Christianity does not see in the law of Moses a guide to practical living. (Indeed today some Messianic congregations have taken steps towards recognizing the binding nature of the law of Moses. These people are also beginning to realize the importance of the defining teachings of Moses. But this is not the traditional Christian position.) From the Christian perspective, the important differences between the Jewish and Christian belief systems, are the differences in attitude towards atonement and the Messiah. 3. How does one achieve atonement for sin? Judaism accepts that the only method for expiation of sin is repentance. If one sincerely regrets his sins, confesses his guilt before God, and redirects his life towards God, then God forgives the sin. There are many actions through which one can express the attitude of repentance. Prayer, charity, and bringing offerings to God’s altar, are legitimate expressions of a repentant heart. In some situations God commands us to bring an offering to give expression to our repentance. But it is the sincerity of the repentance which ultimately achieves the reconciliation with God. Christianity believes that the only method for atonement of sin is through blood sacrifice. The only blood sacrifice which can actually redeem from sin, is the sacrifice of Jesus. Through worship of Jesus the Christian connects with the blood that expiates his sins. 4. What is the role of the Messiah? Judaism believes that the Messiah will be a human king. In the time of the Messiah there will be universal peace. The temple will be rebuilt in Jerusalem. The Jewish people will return to the land of Israel. In the time of the Messiah everyone on earth will be united in their worship of the God of Israel. The Messiah will lead all of mankind in service of God. Christianity believes that the Messiah is a human god. Christianity believes that the chief role of the Messiah is to die. Through the death of the Messiah the world is redeemed of its sins. According to Christian theology, the Messiah will come a second time. When the Messiah returns, then all those who worshipped him will be rewarded, while those who rejected him will be punished. These are the basic differences between the two belief systems. Judaism and Christianity differ on their understanding of the essence of God, the teachings of Moses, atonement, and the role of the Messiah. Judaism and Christianity have different beliefs concerning these basic matters. Only one set of beliefs can be true. Christian missionaries spend much energy in an effort to convince Jews that the Christian belief system is the one which is correct. All the arguments of the missionaries are wasted on the knowledgeable Jew. In order for the Jew to be convinced that his belief system is correct, he must be sure that the testimony of his nation is true. If the Jewish nation is bearing true witness, then any belief system which runs counter to their testimony must be false. If the Jewish people are telling the truth when they testify that God revealed Himself as an absolute unity, then any belief system which denies the absolute unity of God must be false. If the Jewish people are telling the truth when they testify that Moses taught them a living teaching (Torah), then any belief system which denies this fact must be false. It is not necessary for the Jew to examine the testimony of other belief systems to know that Judaism is true. For the Christian to be convinced that his belief system is true, it is not enough to be sure that the Christian scriptures are reporting actual events. In order for the Christian to know that his belief system is correct, he must also determine that the Jewish nation is bearing false witness. For if the Jewish nation is telling the truth, then even if Jesus performed all the miracles which the Christian scriptures claim for him, he would still be a fraud. If indeed God revealed himself at Sinai as an absolute unity, then anyone who advocates worship of a trinity is advocating idolatry. No miracle, no matter how spectacular, can serve as justification to worship an idol. In order to be an honest Christian one must be convinced that the Jewish people are bearing false testimony. **TESTIMONY** **** The history of each of the world religions consists of two periods. The first period is the formative period. This is the time when the belief system was established. The formative era is when the founders of the belief system came to believe in that particular system. Generally this consists of a sequence of events which convinced the founders of the religion as to the veracity of the faith that they were about to adopt. Then comes the era of transmission. This is the time period which separates the foundation of the belief system and the present. Each belief system must provide some way of transporting its message safely through the ages. People who subscribe to any particular belief system must be confident that the founders of their belief system were correct in their assessment of the situation. If there is no way to determine that the founders of the religion were not mistaken, then it is naive to accept their belief system. One must also be sure that the message of the belief system did not get distorted through the passage of time. If the method of transmission is not fool-proof, then again, it is naive to accept the belief system. If there is no way to ascertain the integrity of the transmission, then there is no way of knowing that the belief system being presented is the same system which was adopted by the founders of the faith. The entire belief system which is Judaism is founded upon two pieces of information. The first piece of information is the simple fact that God is an absolute unity. The second piece of information is the fact that Moses is the prophet of God. Both of these pieces of information came to the Jewish people directly from God. At Sinai, God revealed Himself to the Jewish people. It is through this national prophecy that the Jewish people came to know that God is absolutely one. At Sinai, God spoke to Moses while the entire nation listened in. This is how God demonstrated to His people that Moses is His prophet. For forty years, Moses lived among the Jewish nation. During these forty years the nation lived in seclusion. They ate bread that rained down from heaven, and they drank water which poured out from a rock. And during this time, Moses taught them the law which God had revealed to him. When Moses died, he left behind him a complete body of law. Nothing can be added to the teaching of Moses, nor can anything be detracted from it. With the death of Moses, the formative era of Judaism came to a close. After Moses, Judaism had many prophets and many teachers. But the prophets and teachers did not come to introduce a new law. The role of the prophets which followed Moses, was to encourage the people to uphold the law of Moses. The prophets were appointed by God to reprove the nation when they went astray from the law of Moses, and to guide the people in bringing their lives back in line with the law of Moses. The prophets also took the basic themes presented by Moses, such as the suffering of the Jewish nation and their ultimate redemption, and illustrated how these concepts would be played out. But never do the prophets add or detract from the law of Moses. The role of the teachers of the Jewish nation which followed Moses, is to guide the people in the practical application of the law of Moses. Using methods of deduction which were laid down by Moses, the teachers of Israel draw from within the law of Moses, precise instructions which render the law of Moses applicable to every situation. But the teachers did not introduce new law. The prophets and the teachers did not participate in the formation of the Jewish belief system. These men could not be involved in the formation of Judaism. Moses remains the only man authorized by God to deliver His holy law to the people. Judaism recognizes the limited authority of the prophets and the teachers, only because Moses taught that these men should be granted this limited measure of authority. It is the law of Moses which defines the terms; prophet, and teacher. And it is the law of Moses which delineates the roles of the prophets and the teachers. According to these guidelines, the Jewish people recognized many great teachers and prophets. But these men did not affect the formation of the belief system. The formation of the Jewish belief system was completed by Moses. At the time of Moses’s death the Jewish nation already possessed a complete belief system. The era of transmission began when Moses left his people encamped on the eastern bank of the Jordan river. God chose to transmit His message, through the living legacy of the Jewish nation. By the time Moses died, the entire belief system which is Judaism was firmly planted in the hearts and minds of the Jewish nation. This belief system was the focal point of their daily lives. The second generation was born into a nation that worships the God of Sinai, and lives with the teachings of Moses. It is through the living action and belief of an entire nation that we receive the word of God. The written word is also utilized in the transmission of the Jewish belief system. The core of the teachings of Moses was recorded by Moses in the five books. The words of some of the prophets were also written down. Together, the five books of Moses, and the books of the prophets, make up the Jewish scriptures. The books of the Mishna and the Talmud, also play a role in the process of transmitting the Jewish belief system through the ages. The Mishna and the Talmud record many of the decisions which were made by the teachers of Israel pertaining to the application of the law. These books also contain many of the teachings of Moses which were not recorded by Moses in his five books. The books of scripture, the Mishna, and the Talmud, enabled the nation to retain a vast amount of knowledge. But the role of all of these books, is secondary to the testimony of the living people. It is only the testimony of the living people which informs us that these books are authentic and authoritative. The fact that these books were in the possession of a living nation, preserved the accuracy of the texts. And it is only through the living legacy of the nation that we can arrive at a true understanding of the spirit of these books. The written word, no matter how explicit, can always be misinterpreted. The Jew can be confident that the testimony of his nation is true. Both the formation of the belief system, and the transmission of the system were national experiences. In order to assume that the Jewish belief system is false, one must accept that an entire nation is unanimously lying. A Jew is born into a nation of witnesses. A child who is born into a Jewish community in which the educational system is still intact, enters a world of living Judaism. The Jewish educational system is not limited to the scholastic experience. The Jewish home, is the keystone of the Jewish educational system. Long before the Jewish child can read, he has come to know the Creator of the world. Through the simple faith of his parents, the child begins to develop a real relationship with the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. The living example of his parents will teach the child what Sabbath means to the Jew. Passover, Pentecost (Shavuot), and Tabernacles (Succoth), are living realities in the Jewish home. Through the observance of these holidays the Jewish child learns of the exodus, the revelation at Sinai, and the seclusion of the Jewish nation in the wilderness for forty years. (These were the formative events of the Jewish belief system.) As the child grows older, he is introduced to the holy books of Judaism. The child learns the position that each of these books occupy, in the minds and hearts of his people. The meaning and the spirit of these books come alive for the child through the example of his parents and teachers. The child comes to realize that this world of Judaism is the same all over the globe. Wherever Jews who are faithful to the teachings of their ancestors can be found, the belief system is the same. Jews all over the world teach their children to worship the Creator of the world who is absolutely one. Wherever Judaism is alive, Sabbath is the same, kosher food is the same, and family purity is the same. Whenever the Jew has a question concerning the law of Moses, he will consult with the teachers of the law. All over the world, the teachers of Israel use the same methods of deduction to provide answers to the questions posed to them. The Jewish people teach their children that this is how their parents taught them to live, who learned it from their parents etc. in a chain which extends back to Moses. There is no Jew alive today, nor is there any record of a Jew, who claims to possess a deviant tradition which goes back to Moses. All the Jews in history who deviated from the unanimous practices of the nation, admitted that they did not receive their deviant teachings from the previous generation. There is only one belief system which comes with the claim that it goes back to Moses. And that is the Judaism into which the Jewish child is born. He knows that his people are not lying. And he will pass on to his children the testimony that he received from his parents. Throughout history many people rejected or ignored the national testimony of the Jewish people. The Jew faced the rejection of these people with equanimity. The Jew saw that no one else possesses a belief system which claims to have been established by God on a national scale. No other belief systems began its journey through time on a national level. Every other belief system is placing its trust in the testimony of individuals. Individuals can lie. Individuals can be mistaken. A nation cannot unanimously lie. A nation cannot be unanimously mistaken concerning concrete events which were collectively experienced. As long as no rival belief system is claiming a national revelation, the Jew can be confident that Judaism is true. As long as Moses remains the only prophet who had the truth of his mission attested to by God on a national scale, the Jew can be confident that his teachings still stand. If the Jew faces other belief systems with equanimity, then he faces Christianity with sheer amazement. Other belief systems may reject the Jewish testimony outright. But Christianity is different. Although Christianity rejects the Jewish testimony, they still accept the Jewish scriptures. The Jewish scripture is one of the pillars of the Christian faith. The Christian claim to the messiah-ship of Jesus, is founded upon the presumption that he fulfilled the prophecies of the Jewish scriptures. If the Christians would recognize that Jesus did not fulfill these prophecies, they would then admit that he is not the Messiah. All the alleged miracles of Jesus would be tossed out the window if his message would be seen as running contrary to Jewish scripture. It is only because Christians believe that Jesus’s mission conforms with the vision of the Jewish prophets, that they accept him as the Messiah. Who were the prophets of Jewish scripture that the Christian belief system considers their words so powerful? How do we know that they really existed? And how do we know that the books of scripture were indeed authored by them? How can we know that these people were not frauds? In the history of mankind few terms were misused as often as the title “prophet”. What criteria was used to establish the authenticity of the scriptural prophets? The only way that the world knows of the existence of the Jewish prophets is through the testimony of the Jewish people. The Jewish nation bears witness that these men existed and that the books of scripture were written by them. The Jewish nation testifies that these men were able to demonstrate that they were really sent by God. The criteria used to determine the authenticity of the prophets were the teachings of Moses as applied by the teachers of the Jewish nation. If these teachers would not have acknowledged that the prophets of scripture were authentic, we would not have their books today. The testimony of the Jewish nation is the means through which the message of the prophets travels through time. But Christianity places no trust in the testimony of the Jewish people. Christianity maintains that the Jewish people are lying about the fundamental concepts of their belief system. Christianity is founded upon the notion that the Jewish people are bearing false witness concerning the revelation at Sinai. All of Christendom admits that this was an event which took place in the presence of the entire nation. Christianity acknowledges that this revelation made it clear to the Jewish people if God is, or isn’t, an absolute unity. The Jewish people testify that God revealed Himself as an absolute unity. Yet Christianity asserts that the Jews are unanimously lying, every last one of them. Christianity believes that the Jewish people falsely attribute to Moses a massive body of law which he never taught. So how can Christianity be sure that this nation of liars is not attributing the books of scripture to prophets who never wrote them? Christianity accuses the Jewish nation of maintaining loyalty to a fraudulent belief system. So how can Christianity rely on this same nation to sort out the genuine prophets from the frauds? The Jew accepts the words of the Jewish scripture based upon the testimony of the Jewish people. But upon which foundation does the Christian base his acceptance of Jewish scripture? Christianity uses the words of the Jewish prophets to lay the groundwork of their belief system. At the same time Christianity has total confidence that the Jewish nation is bearing false witness. This is hypocrisy. Either the witness is lying or he is telling the truth. It cannot be both. SCRIPTURE In the early years of Christianity, the Church came to the realization that in order to establish its own credibility, it must first discredit Judaism. There were many methods the Church used in order to achieve this objective. These included spreading lies about the Jews, teaching that the Jews are children of the devil, and general vilification of the chosen nation. The only attempt that the Church made to appeal to the human intellect was their exploitation of the Jewish scriptures. The Church attempted to present the Jewish scriptures as a document which supports the Christian belief system, and as one which stands in contradiction to the Jewish belief system. The Church would have us believe that the authors of Jewish scripture, namely; Moses and the prophets, all subscribed to the Christian belief system. In order to substantiate this preposterous theory, the Church spent millions of man-hours combing the length and breadth of the Jewish scriptures. They were looking for verses which could be read as supportive to the Christian belief system. From the thousands of verses in Jewish scripture, the Church has found a handful of statements which could be manipulated to read as supportive of the Christian belief system, and as standing in contradiction to Judaism. The Church then presented these verses, together with the Christian explanation of these verses, and made the claim that the authors of these verses were Christians by belief. The Church proposes the argument that the Jewish people are not loyal to their own holy books. Based on the Christian interpretation of these verses (known as “prooftexts”) the Church advances the theory, that the Jewish belief system stands in direct contradiction to the sacred books venerated by the Jewish people. According to the Christian claim, the authors of these books subscribed to the Christian belief system, while their disciples confused their message, and created Judaism. The Church thus claims that Judaism failed in the transmission of the very foundations of their religion. If indeed the Church has succeeded in demonstrating that the Jewish belief system possesses inherent contradictions, then the Jewish scriptures should be discarded. We must bear in mind that it is only through the testimony of the Jewish people that we have scripture. It was the religious leadership of the Jewish people who determined the authenticity of the scriptural prophets. If the Jewish method of transmission managed to distort the very essence of their religion, then it is foolhardy to accept their scriptural canon. The truth of the matter is, that the Jewish nation has been studying scripture since it was put down in writing. Every word, and every nuance of the text is precious to the Jew. Jews have been reading these “proof-texts” centuries before Christianity was born. Each one of those verses has a classical Jewish interpretation, which clearly explains how these verses conform with the Jewish belief system. The Church maintains that the Jewish interpretation is wrong. The Church asserts that it is only an anti-Christian bias, which blinds the Jews from seeing the true meaning of these verses. The problem with this assertion is that many Christian scholars have come to agree with the Jewish interpretation of these verses. These people were not blinded by an anti-Christian bias, yet they accept the Jewish understanding of these verses as honest interpretation. It seems perhaps, that the Church is operating under a bias. It is this pro-Christian bias which causes them to read these verses as proof to the veracity of the Christian belief system. Much of the missionary effort to attract Jews to Christianity is focused on these proof-texts. These are the verses in the Jewish scripture which Christians see as supportive of their belief system. These verses relate to the areas of difference between the Jewish and Christian belief systems. The verses which the missionaries use as proof-texts are not the only verses which speak about these subjects. Jewish scripture gives a lot of coverage to each of these subjects, and the proof texts form only a small segment of the overall picture which scripture presents. Scripture gives us a clear picture concerning each of these subjects. The general message of scripture conforms with the Jewish belief system. The few missionary proof-text verses are generally vague and ambiguous. If the Christian interpretation of these verses is honest, then we would be facing an inherent contradiction within scripture itself. If one would not know the Jewish interpretation for a given proof-text, the honest thing to do is to say “I don’t know what it means” rather than assume that this verse stands in contradiction to the general message of scripture. Judaism and Christianity differ in their attitudes towards the essence of God, the teachings of Moses, atonement, and the Messiah. What is the clarity that scripture gives us on these subjects? What is the overall message of scripture? In this brief study we will not examine the missionary proof-texts. It will suffice for us to see that the Jewish belief system is firmly rooted in the words of the prophets. 1) The essence of God The Jewish scriptures testify that God revealed Himself to the entire body of the Jewish nation. The entire nation heard God’s voice proclaim _“I am the Lord your God who brought you out of the land of Egypt, from the house of bondage. You shall not have any other gods beside Me.” _This is how God demonstrated to His people who it is they are to worship. At the same time God was teaching the people whom they are not to worship. Worship of anyone other than the God who brought the nation out of Egypt, is idolatry. The Jewish scriptures testify that the Sinaitic revelation was an all inclusive demonstration. After the revelation at Sinai there can be no room for doubt. Concerning this revelation Moses tells the Jewish people “_To you it was demonstrated in order that you know that the Lord is the God, there is none beside Him.” _The people who were privileged to witness this great revelation were commanded _“you should make it known to your children and to your children’s children.” _When God commands the nation to kill people who are involved with idolatry, He makes reference to this revelation. In those cases where the death penalty is to be implemented, God identifies the idol by the simple terms _“that which I have not commanded” _or _“those which you do not know.” _It is clear that God expects the Jewish people to identify the idol by process of elimination. If this is not what you were commanded to worship, then it is another god. The Jewish people testify that God revealed himself at Sinai as an absolute unity. Worship of anyone else, is by definition, idolatry. (The biblical quotations in the preceding paragraph can be found in Exodus chapter 20, and Deuteronomy chapters 4, 13, and 18.) No one ever claimed that it was Jesus who was revealed to the Jewish people at Sinai. The first worshipers of Jesus did not claim that with their worship they were following a tradition which goes back to Sinai. According to the definition of scripture, worship of Jesus is idolatry. The Jewish people were granted a revelation in order that they should know whom to worship. This was an extra. It is clear from Jewish scripture that God expects the human conscience to be able to distinguish between worship of God, and idolatry. Time and time again, the prophets appeal to human logic, and sometimes even to human humor in order to demonstrate the evil of idolatry. Jeremiah exclaims (Jer. 10:11) _“Tell them, gods that did not create heaven and earth should go lost from this earth and from beneath these heavens.” _Jeremiah is pointing out the absurdity which is inherent in worship of anyone aside from the Creator. A god who operates in an arena which he did not create, is no god. Similarly, Isaiah points out the foolishness of placing faith in a human-being. (Is. 2:22) _“Cease ye of man that has breath in his nostrils for of what worth is he.” _Isaiah is demonstrating the futility of worshipping a man. If he is dependent on a constant supply of oxygen for his own well being, then how is he going to help you? Worship of a human being, is abhorrent to the human conscience. Yet this is what Christianity advocates. Whichever way you wrap it, Christianity is pointing to a man, and saying “that is god”. Scripture is clear that when it comes to idolatry, you should not ignore the cry of your conscience. Again, by scriptural definition, worship of Jesus is idolatry. 2) The teachings of Moses Judaism testifies that Moses taught them an entire body of law which defines the scriptural commandments. Judaism also testifies that the law of Moses authorizes people to make decisions in order to implement scriptural law. These decisions are binding upon the entire nation. Christianity rejects this testimony. Christianity asserts that Moses taught no more than what he wrote in the five books. And he certainly didn’t authorize anyone to make decisions concerning the application of God’s law. Upon examining scripture, one discovers that the Christian rejection of the Jewish position is illogical. If we read scripture with the Christian position in mind, we will find that the teachings of Moses are practically meaningless. Take the scriptural holidays as an example. God directs His people to celebrate the holiday of Passover. Anyone who eats leaven during this holiday is liable to the divine punishment of having his soul cut off. This is to take place from the fourteenth day to the twenty-first day of the first month. Scripture does not tell us when this first month is to begin. In fact, scripture says nothing about the construction of a calendar. If we assume that Moses was told nothing more than what he wrote in the five books, then we are facing a serious problem. How are we expected to know when Passover is going to begin? It is obvious that Moses was told by God how to construct a calendar which would determine when God’s holidays are to be celebrated. Indeed the Jewish people testify that Moses taught them how to construct a calendar which would determine the times of the scriptural holidays. Throughout history this is the calendar that the Jews have been following. The Jews observed the holidays according to the teachings of Moses which were not recorded in the five books. There are many groups today who subscribe to the Christian belief system, but at the same time they attempt to observe the scriptural holidays. These people observe Passover on the same days that the Jewish nation celebrates Passover. This is hypocrisy. If indeed these people believe that Moses was taught nothing which he did not record in the five books, they should construct their own scriptural calendar. And if they admit that there were some teachings of Moses which were not recorded in scripture, then they should ask themselves the following questions. How did God expect us to learn of these unwritten teachings of Moses? What means did God use to transport this information to us? If God considered the testimony of the nation a reliable means of transporting a complicated calendar, then how can these people be so confident that the testimony of this same nation is not reliable concerning simple matters, such as the absolute unity of God? Scripture is equally clear concerning the authority of the teachers of Israel to render decisions concerning God’s law. In chapter 17 of Deuteronomy, Moses directs the people to consult with the courts. The decision of the court is to be heeded. One who blatantly ignores the court decision should be put to death. Similarly, we find in chapter 19 of second Chronicles, how the righteous king Jehoshaphat fulfilled this directive of Moses. The chapter describes how Jehoshaphat established courts in the land of Judah and in the city of Jerusalem. The king refers to two leaders to whom the judges can turn to with their questions. One was to direct the courts concerning God’s law, while the other officer’s role was to decide matters which pertain to the king. It is quite clear that the scriptures expected these judges to make decisions concerning the application of God’s law. In chapters 13 and 17 of Deuteronomy, Moses directs the entire nation to participate in the execution of people involved with idolatry. It is obvious that the guilt of these lawbreakers was determined by a court of qualified judges. Yet the entire nation is commanded to implement the decision of these men. It is clear that not only does God authorize men to make decisions concerning the implementation of His holy law, but God also instructs the Jewish people to abide by these decisions. 3) Atonement The Jewish belief system maintains that it is only repentance, turning back to God, that can achieve atonement for sin. The worship of Jesus, can do nothing to help expiate sin. Christianity on the other hand maintains that it is worship of Jesus which achieves atonement for sin. Repentance can do nothing to achieve atonement for sin. (Some prominent Christian scholars concede the point and admit that repentance plays an important role in the process of expiating sin. They believe that it is repentance together with the blood of Jesus which gains God’s forgiveness. But this opinion is not accepted by the vast majority of Evangelical Christians.) The Jewish position is firmly rooted in scripture. The book of Jonah describes how the wicked people of Nineveh were threatened with destruction. The inhabitants of that city repented and as a result, God rescinded the decree of destruction. The prophet Ezekiel (in chapters 18 and 33) tells the people _‘and the wicked, should he repent from all his sins_ _that he has done and he will keep all my statutes and do justice and righteousness, he shall surely live, he shall not die. All his iniquity shall not be remembered against him, in the righteousness that he has done he shall live.” _These are not isolated passages in scripture. The concept of repentance is one of the predominant themes in scripture. The Christian cannot point to any one verse in scripture which will tell you that repentance does not bring about the expiation of sin. Nor can the Christian find a verse which states that worship of the messiah can achieve atonement. The Christian attempts to assemble several scriptural themes, which when pieced together, point to the Christian system of atonement. This type of argument has an obvious weakness. Since there is no explicit scriptural quotation to support the Christian position, then it must rely on the capabilities of human analysis to draw accurate conclusions from a complicated conglomeration of scriptural themes. There is simply too much room for error. When we pit this argument against the straightforward statements which support the Jewish position, we are pitting human reason against the explicit word of God. When one examines the scriptural themes which the Christians quote to support their position, it becomes clear that not only do these themes fail to lend support to the Christian argument, but these themes actually testify against the Christian position. The Christians point to the scriptural theme of the sinful nature of man. If man is so sinful, then how can his repentance count for anything before God? Indeed, scripture declares _“how can one born of a woman be righteous?” _(Job 15:14) This sits well with the Jewish belief system. Judaism believes that indeed every created being must be imperfect before God. But it is the Christian belief system which stands in contradiction to this basic scriptural teaching. The entire Christian belief system is founded upon the notion that one born of a woman was totally righteous. The Christian scriptures (Ro. 4) quote the verse in Genesis 15, where it says that God credited Abraham’s faith to him for righteousness. The Christian argument is that only faith can count before God as righteousness, and not action. But whom did Abraham place his faith in? It certainly was not Jesus. It is the Jew’s faith in the words of the God of Abraham which leads him to believe all that God has taught. It is the God of Abraham who said _“return to me and I shall return to you” _(Mal. 3), and the Jewish nation takes God on His word. Christians point to the scriptural concept of blood sacrifice. The law of Moses spends so much time describing the various offerings. Does this not demonstrate clearly how blood sacrifice is central to the atonement process? But what is a blood sacrifice? A blood sacrifice was an offering brought by a sinner to God’s altar as an expression of his repentant heart. Some of the sacrifices were national offerings. These offerings were paid for, through a fund which was replenished every year by a collection taken from each individual Jew. These offerings were brought in the Temple which was built by the Jewish people. The national offerings were an expression of the entire nation’s sincere desire to be reconciled with God. But according to the Christian belief system no action on man’s part could bring about atonement for sin. The blood offerings of scripture testify that man’s action can, and do achieve atonement for sin. 4) Messiah This is how Moses describes the Messianic era (Deut. 30). _“And it shall be that all these things come upon you, the blessing and the curse that I have set down before you, and you will bring it to your heart amongst all the nations that the Lord your God has driven you. And you shall return unto the Lord your God and you shall hearken to His voice according to all that I command you today, you and your children, with all your heart and with all your soul. And the Lord your God will return your captivity and He will have compassion upon you, and he will return and gather you from all the nations that the Lord your God has scattered you there. If your outcasts be at the ends of the heaven, from there will the Lord your God gather you and from there will He fetch you. And the Lord your God will bring you to the land which your ancestors inherited, and you shall inherit it, and He will do you good and He will multiply you more than your ancestors. And the Lord your God will circumcise your heart and the heart of your children to love the Lord your God with all your heart and all your soul for the sake of your life. And the Lord your_ _God shall place all these curses upon your enemies and upon those that hate you who have persecuted you. And you will return and hearken to the voice of the Lord and you shall do all His commandments that I command you today. And the Lord your God will make you plenteous in all the work of your_ _hands, in the fruit of your body, and in the fruit of your cattle, and in the fruit of your land, for good, for the Lord will turn to rejoice over you for good just as he rejoiced over your ancestors. When you hearken to the voice of the Lord your God to keep His commandments and statutes which are written in this book of teaching, when you return to the Lord your God with all your heart and all your soul.” _ __ The prophets of scripture elaborated upon the basic messianic theme presented by Moses. The prophets describe in great detail, the ingathering of the Jewish exile, the rebuilding of the land of Israel, the temple in Jerusalem, peace on earth, and universal knowledge of God. The prophets provided a clear and unambiguous picture of the age of the Messiah. The fact that these prophecies were not fulfilled tells us that the Messiah has not arrived. But these prophecies tell us more than that. These prophecies testify that when the Messiah does arrive he will not be a Christian. What would a Christian Messiah do in a world in which obedience to God is expressed through observance of the law of Moses? who would the Christian Messiah teach, in a world that looks to the Aaronic priests for guidance in their observance of God’s law? (Ezekiel 45:23) For whom would the Christian Messiah be providing atonement, in a world which sees the blood offerings of Moses being offered in the Jerusalem temple as they were in days of old? Not only do the Jewish prophets tell us nothing about the Christian Messiah, but they leave no room for him in their vision of the future. In the face of the explicit message of the Jewish scriptures, the missionaries quote these same prophets to lend support for their version of the role of the Messiah. It will suffice us to point out that every one of the Christian proof-texts is a subject of debate, even amongst Christian scholars, as to their true interpretation. There is no way one can honestly invoke these difficult and ambiguous passages to support a position which stands in contradiction to the entire messianic theme presented by the prophets. All in all, the message of scripture is quite clear. One who reads the Jewish scriptures from cover to cover will certainly encounter many vague and ambiguous passages, but at the same time he will find clarity concerning the most basic subjects. Scripture leaves the reader with no doubt that the Jewish people are the witnesses to whom God chose to reveal His glory. Scripture leaves the reader with no doubt, that the law of Moses is a living law which applies to every generation. Scripture is abundantly clear that sincere repentance achieves God’s forgiveness for sin. And the picture the Jewish prophets painted of the Messianic age is a complete portrait which leaves no room for a dying god who is supposed to be an all atoning sacrifice. The traditional Jew was never moved by the Christian argument. When the Jew rejected Christianity it was with confidence and with clarity. The Jew’s rejection of Christianity is founded upon the testimony of an entire nation. A nation whom God Himself chose as His witnesses. The clarity of the Jewish rejection is reflected in the words of the Jewish prophets. This is what empowered our nation to overcome all obstacles and preserve the message which was handed to them at Sinai. The message is still intact. Come and learn. NOTE: The following section is included, not because it reflects the attitude of the Jew’s rejection of Christianity. The Jew never saw a need to examine the testimony of Christianity in order to expose its emptiness. A clear understanding of the Jewish testimony is all that is required for the Jew to be confident in his rejection of Christianity. The reason this section was included is because it illustrates how an accusation to the effect, that a given belief system failed in the transmission of its message can be substantiated. **THE TESTIMONY OF CHRISTIANITY** The formative era of the Christian belief system, was the time that Jesus revealed his teachings to his disciples. The fact that the disciples understood that Jesus fulfilled certain prophecies of the Jewish scriptures, and the miracles that Jesus allegedly performed, established his credibility in the eyes of his followers. Once his credibility was established, his disciples accepted his teachings. The entire Christian belief system should be contained within the teachings of Jesus. Judaism rejects the Christian belief system at its foundation. According to the Jewish belief system, the disciples of Jesus were mistaken. Christianity claims that Jesus taught that he is god. The disciples should never have accepted this claim. Both, the national testimony of the Jewish people, and the human conscience, equate worship of a human being with idolatry. All the miracles that the disciples believed that Jesus performed, and all the prophecies that the disciples thought that Jesus fulfilled, cannot justify idolatry. Judaism does not recognize the authority of the founders of Christianity, to establish the type of belief system which is credited to them. The formative era of the Jewish belief system, was the time that the Jewish nation were in the desert, on their way from Egypt to the land of Israel. The national revelation at Sinai, and the teachings of Moses, form the basis of the Jewish belief system. Christianity recognizes the authority of the founders of Judaism. Christianity acknowledges that whatever God revealed to the Jewish nation, and that whatever Moses taught, is absolutely true. Christianity does not reject Judaism at its foundation. Christianity rejects Judaism, because it questions the integrity of the transmission of the Jewish belief system. Christianity accuses Judaism of distorting the original teachings of their founders. Christianity makes this accusation despite the fact that; 1. it was God Himself who established the method through which the Jewish belief system should be transmitted to all generations, 2. from its inception, the Jewish belief system was in the hands of a nation, 3. there is only one belief system which claims a direct line of tradition which goes back to Moses, 4. the Christian accusation is self-contradictory, (Christianity accepts the Jewish scriptures, while rejecting the testimony of the Jewish nation which is the only basis for accepting the veracity of the Jewish scriptures) 5. the scriptural evidence presented to substantiate this accusation is practically, nonexistent, 6. There is no historical evidence to substantiate the accusation. (there is no point in Jewish history which Christians can point to and say “here is where the Jewish method of transmission went wrong”) In spite of all this, Christianity places its full faith in this accusation. If this accusation is false, and the Jewish nation truly managed to preserve the original message of their founders, then Christianity is the greatest fraud perpetrated upon mankind. Christianity admits to this. Still, they are fully confident that Judaism is a distortion of the teachings of its original founders. We will now turn our focus upon the Christian method of transmission. Which method does Christianity rely on, in order to transmit its message throughout the ages? How does Christianity attempt to preserve the original teachings of Jesus? The Evangelical Christian will answer these questions by pointing to the books of the Christian scriptures. According to Evangelical Christianity, these books should have accurately preserved the message of the founders of Christianity. We will note that; 1. Jesus, the god of Christianity did not write any of these books. Neither did he specify that any of these books be written. In fact Jesus did not authorize anyone to teach in his name except for his immediate disciples. Jesus expected to return in the lifetime of his immediate disciples, so he saw no need in establishing a chain of tradition. 2. The entire Christian tradition is founded upon the testimony of individuals. 3. There were many groups in the early years of Christianity, each claiming a direct tradition which goes back to the disciples of Jesus. Each of these groups had a distinctly different belief system. Some of these groups had their own version of the Christian scriptures. (Those divergent gospels did not survive the centuries of Church censorship.) In spite of all this, Evangelical Christianity places its full faith in these books of Christian scripture. Evangelical Christianity is totally confident that these books represent the original teachings of Jesus. An unbiased reading of the Christian scriptures will reveal that this confidence is misplaced. Not only do the Christian scriptures reveal that Jesus did not teach Evangelical Christianity, but these books provide the historical evidence necessary to substantiate the accusation that the Church distorted the original teachings of Jesus. In order to make this accusation against Christianity, it is not necessary to grant that the Christian scriptures are anything more than the words of men. We recognize that the Christian scriptures were written in the latter half of the first century of the Common Era. These books were written by men who believed a certain way, and we expect these books to reflect their beliefs. We do not read these books in order to discover direct words of truth. We can only hope to gain an understanding as to how the writers of these books viewed the world. And more importantly, we will discover how these writers wanted the world to view them. The authors of the Christian scriptures describe the development of the early church in the following manner. Jesus was a Jewish man, who lived in the land of Israel. When he was about thirty years old, he began to travel throughout the country. For about three years, Jesus traveled and taught. By the time Jesus died, he had created a small following. All of his followers were Jews. Prominent among Jesus’s followers were his twelve disciples. These disciples formed a community with its center in Jerusalem. The community of Jesus’s followers was led by James, a brother of Jesus. This community is referred to as the “Jerusalem Church”. In the years following Jesus’s death, the Jerusalem Church grew in size. At one point, the authors of Christian scriptures claim that they numbered several thousand. But the members of this church were all Jews. Christianity reached the non-Jewish world through the person of Paul. Paul traveled the length and breadth of the Mediterranean, teaching the gentile world about Jesus. Paul founded many churches throughout the Roman Empire. The churches which Paul established were predominantly gentile. The Christian scriptures end their narrative at this point. They leave the reader at the historical point where there are two churches; the Jewish church of James, and the gentile church of Paul. History tells us that the Jewish church of James did not survive as a separate entity. By the time Christianity became the established religion of the Roman Empire, there were almost no Jewish Christians left. The few Jewish Christians which still existed were persecuted as heretics by the gentile church. All of Christianity as it exists today was transmitted through the body of the gentile church. The books of Christian scripture were products of the gentile church. They may have included in these books, material which came from the Jewish Christians. But the gentile church was the editor of this material. It was the gentile church who determined the contents of the Christian scriptures, and who transmitted these texts to the future generations. In order to be convinced that the gentile church is truly transmitting the original message of Jesus, one must determine that Paul’s teachings conformed with the teachings of Jesus. The gentile church only learned of Jesus through the teachings of Paul. If Paul’s teachings were not synonymous with the teachings of Jesus, then the gentile church does not possess the original message of Jesus. To determine Paul’s connection to Jesus, we will turn to the books of Christian scripture. It is clear that the editors of these books were strongly motivated to present Paul as one who is faithfully transmitting the original message of Jesus. Yet even these biased writers, were not able to do so. The Christian scriptures describe the basis of Paul’s mission in the following manner. Paul never saw Jesus in real life. Neither did Paul learn of Jesus’s teachings through the disciples of Jesus. Paul emphatically states (in the 1st and 2nd chapters of Galatians) that no living person was involved in transmitting Jesus’s message to him. Paul only learned of the teachings of Jesus through a series of visions. In these visions, Jesus appeared to him and imparted his teachings. Paul’s entire message was the product of these visions. The only way we can verify the truth of Paul’s claim, is by determining the reaction of Jesus’s disciples to Paul’s message. These men who lived with Jesus and heard him teach, could compare the teachings that they heard, to the prophecy of Paul. How did the Jewish following of James react to Paul’s claim to prophecy? Paul makes the claim (Galatians 2:9) that the leaders of the Jerusalem Church acknowledged the fact that he was appointed (by the dead Jesus) as a messenger to the gentiles. But Paul was lying. James and the Jerusalem Church never acknowledged the validity of Paul’s visions. It is the Christian scriptures themselves who contradict Paul’s claim. The 15th chapter of the book of Acts, describes how the leadership of the Jerusalem Church disregarded Paul’s claim to prophecy. Paul had come to Jerusalem. He had been preaching to the gentiles that they are not required to practice the law of Moses. Some members of the Jerusalem Church disagreed with Paul. They felt that in order for a gentile to join their following, he should be required to observe the law of Moses. This question was brought before the leadership of the Jerusalem Church. The elders of the church discussed the question, and James handed down his decision. His judgment was that the gentiles were not obligated to observe the entirety of the law of Moses as a prerequisite to joining the Christian community. But he stipulated that the gentiles were obligated to observe certain dietary laws, and to avoid immorality. If Paul was telling us the truth when he claimed that the leadership of the Jerusalem Church acknowledged him as a true prophet, then this story makes no sense. Here we have Paul, who was personally appointed by the dead Jesus as his emissary to the gentile world. Whatever Paul taught was personally revealed to him in these prophetic visions. One of the central teachings of Paul was that the gentile world is not bound by the law of Moses. Yet when the leaders of the Jerusalem Church are in doubt as to what Jesus would have said concerning the gentiles, they discuss the question, and look to James for guidance. If there was any truth to Paul’s claim, that these leaders acknowledged the truth of his prophecy, then they should have simply asked him “what did Jesus tell you?” The fact that they considered the question, and the method that they used to resolve the question, clearly tells us that these men did not believe that Jesus had ever spoken to Paul. The author of the book of Acts, his bias notwithstanding, could not hide this simple fact. The difference between the gentile church founded by Paul, and the Jerusalem Church founded by Jesus, was not limited to the question of the authenticity of Paul’s prophecy. These two institutions espoused two totally different philosophies. The central teaching of Pauline Christianity is, that faith in the redeeming sacrifice of Jesus, is the only valid method through which atonement for sin can be achieved. The entire philosophy of Paul, revolves around this one teaching. Evangelical Christianity is founded upon this basic teaching of Paul. If you were to ask an Evangelical Christian to sum up his belief system in one sentence, he would respond with this point. That faith in Jesus is the only redemption from sin. In fact the entire concept of the messiah- ship of Jesus is basically limited to this one point. Jesus is the messiah of Evangelical Christians, only because they believe that his death provided atonement for sin. But the Jerusalem Church which was established by Jesus, and which was guided by his disciples, did not believe in this teaching of Paul. They did not believe that faith in Jesus could effectively atone for their sins. This is demonstrated by the testimony of the Christian scriptures. The 21st chapter in the book of Acts reports that the normal activities of the members of the Jerusalem Church included the offering of animals for the explicit purpose of the expiation of sin. The book of Acts describes how four members of the Jerusalem Church had taken a Nazirite vow. This means that they had voluntarily brought themselves into a situation where they would be required (by the law of Moses) to bring an animal as a sin offering. It is clear that these people saw in the temple offerings a valid method for the expiation of sin. If they believed as Paul did, that Jesus died for their sins once and for all, then there would be no point in bringing a sin offering in the temple. The fact that the Jerusalem Church still participated in the temple offerings after Jesus had died, tells us that they did not see in Jesus’s death an all atoning sacrifice. These people were not Evangelical Christians. The Christian scriptures provide both the theological and the historical justification to the accusation that Christianity has failed in the transmission of its own message. The Christian scriptures tell us that the disciples of Jesus never believed the fundamental teaching of Evangelical Christianity. These people who lived with Jesus and heard him preach did not believe, that with the death of Jesus, the world is redeemed of its sins. The Christian scriptures also tell us, at which historical point the break in the transmission occurred. These books tell us that Paul, the father of modern Christianity, had no connection to Jesus. Christianity is an edifice erected upon the testimony of one man. All of Christianity stands upon Paul’s word that Jesus appeared to him. The only people that were qualified to verify Paul’s claim, contradicted him to his face. This emerges from the pages of the very books which Christianity regards as true witnesses to its claims. **SUMMARY** Judaism and Christianity are two different belief systems. Each one of these belief systems categorically rejects the fundamental teachings of the other. Christian missionaries attempt to persuade Jews to abandon Judaism in favor of Christianity. In their efforts at achieving this objective, the missionaries try to present logical arguments which would justify a conversion from Judaism to Christianity. The typical missionary sales pitch has the missionary pointing to a verse in the Jewish scriptures which seems to be supporting the Christian belief system. Essentially, the missionary argument is that the original teachers of Judaism (the authors of Jewish scripture) were Christians by belief. If Jews today are not Christians, it is only because they have distorted the message of their original teachers. This is the thrust of the missionary argument. The Jew cannot accept this argument for several reasons. 1. It was God Himself who established the original Jewish belief system. The missionary admits as much. It is clear that God expected the message of Judaism to be available to the last generations. The means through which God transmitted His message, is the national testimony of the Jewish people. If God deemed the living testimony of this nation to be a reliable method of transmitting His message, the Jew will not differ. 2. The missionary argument has an entire nation unanimously corrupting the essence of their belief system. In order for the missionary argument to be true, one must accept one of the following scenarios. Either a national conspiracy is involved, or a nation unanimously made the same series of mistakes. Both of these are statistical improbabilities. 3. The missionary argument is self-contradictory. If the Jewish nation managed to corrupt the very essence of their belief system, then there is no reason to accept the sanctity of Jewish scripture. It is only through the testimony of the Jewish nation that we know these books to be sacred. If the national testimony of the Jews cannot be trusted, then there is no way of knowing that there is any authenticity to the books of Jewish scripture. 4. The authors of Jewish scripture were quite clear about their beliefs. And they were not Christians. As a general rule the Jew felt no need to counter every missionary argument. However, it often happened that the Church would force the Jew to respond to each of the missionary arguments. Many books contain a record the Jewish responses to the various missionary arguments. Any decent Jewish library will include some of these books. In addition, many of the prominent Jewish commentators of scripture will explain why Jews do not accept the missionary interpretation of a given verse. (These include, but are not limited to, the commentaries of Ibn Ezra, and Abarbenel.) It is not difficult to find Jewish responses to the individual missionary arguments. Furthermore, many Christian scholars have come to recognize the dishonesty of the various missionary applications of Jewish scripture. There is yet another factor which should be taken into consideration when we examine the missionary argument. There is an old Jewish saying which advises “before you point to the splinter between the eyes of your friend, remove the beam from between your own eyes”. If the missionary demands that the Jew search the Jewish scriptures for evidence that the original teachers of Judaism were not Jews by belief, then the missionary should first search the Christian scriptures. Had the missionaries the honesty to undertake this search, they would discover sufficient evidence to substantiate the theory that Jesus, James and Peter were not Christians. In place of the futile attempt to assail the solid foundations of Judaism, the missionary should examine the breaches in his own house.

read all comments

1 Sarah R = "While there are certainly grave differences between Judaism today and Christianity, there are also many points on which they agree. For example, both Judaism and Christianity believe in ONE God who is eternal, infinite, and almighty; holy, righteous and just, and also loving, merciful and forgiving. Both Judaism and Christianity believe that God created the heavens and the earth, and created mankind in His own image. Both Judaism and Christianity believe that God is a relational God who communicates with His people. Both Judaism and Christianity believe in the Hebrew Scriptures or Old Testament. Both Judaism and Christianity believe in the same ethical code, often called the "Judeo-Christian ethic". They are not as incompatible or "mutually exclusive" as this article would have you believe. Really the most significant place where Judaism and Christianity disagree, is in the Person and work of Jesus Christ."
2 Sarah R = "Christians see the Bible, both the Old and New Testament, as one revelation from God. Therefore rather than seeing a "dual foundation" or Old Testament (Jewish Scripture) and New Testament (Jesus) we see a sole foundation: the Word of God, as revealed to us through Scripture (the entire Bible) and through Jesus (John 1:1,2)."
3 Sarah R = "What established Jesus' credibility is more than the miracles. Many people did and still do miracles in God's name and authority. Jesus did miracles by His own name and authority. He also taught with authority in a way that had not been heard before. But even still, all that would have just established Him as a "great teacher" or "prophet" if He had not risen from the dead. It is Jesus' resurrection that gives Him true credibility."
4 Yaakov ben Chaim Tzvi = "Christians talk of Jesus' resurrection as a historical "fact". My great grandfather also resurrected himself from the dead and then went to heaven to sit next to God. Why is your version believable, yet my story not? The reality is that no proof exists for the resurrection and it's a matter of "faith". It's a story a person can choose to believe or not. When you start making claims that Jesus' resurrection gives him credibility, I actually think it's funny since it's nothing more than your belief but certainly nowhere even close to fact. As fact, Jesus has no more credibility than Mohammed, Buddha, or Krishna..none. In fact, I could argue that Jesus has less."
5 Cary W = "Though this is true, kind sir, yet do you not know that this invisible God of the Jews you say could never be a man, made each of us in His own image?  He is the author of and the father of us all.  Having made us in His image, why would it be such a stretch to believe that maybe we needed to have Him actually come down here and experience the wonders and the horrors of this place with us?"
6 Sarah R = "Interestingly, Christians agree 100% with this statement. We also believe in a God of absolute unity, only we define it differently: God, a perfect unity of three personifications, Father, Son and Holy Spirit."
7 Sarah R = "The life of a Christian, like my life, is devoted to God. Jesus is God, so it's a bit repetitive to say, but God is the center of all."
8 Sarah R = "Here is a point where Christians disagree with Judaism, mainly because Jesus disagreed on this point as well. The Bible says that Moses "wrote down everything the Lord had said" (Ex 24:4; Dt. 31:9), not that some things he passed on separately. Some Christian theologians believe that the traditions referred to here were added during the Babylonian exile, when the Jewish people needed to hold onto something and to separate from the pagan culture around them. They were well established by the time Jesus came around, and He had frequent conflicts with the Jewish leaders over their implementation of these traditions. Jesus said that not only did the additional traditions make things too hard for people but also tended to change the focus on looking good before each other, rather than before God. Jesus' message to His Jewish audience was to come back to the heart of the law - which was to point people to Him."
9 Yaakov ben Chaim Tzvi = "It's actually not possible to follow the written word without the Oral teachings. There are many commandments which are too vague to understand. Here are a few examples:Deuteronomy 6:8 –“Tie them as symbols on your hands and bind them on your foreheads.” Tie what? What are these things made out of? What do they look like? No explanation or detail is given in the entire written scripture. Are we to assume that Moses told us to tie these things, yet never even told us what they were, or how to make them?Deuteronomy 12:21 – “slaughter your cattle and small animals, in the manner that I have shown you”. How are we to slaughter an animal? There is nothing shown or written down in the Scripture, however the Oral law explains all the details in order to follow this commandment which Moses just stated that he "showed" the Jewish people. Exodus 25:40 – With regards to the Holy utensils Moses said “make everything according to what I have shown you here on the mountain”.  The written Torah doesn’t say how to make these items. Do you mean to tell me that since there is nothing written, Moses never told anyone? On the contrary, everything that was “shown” to Israel was passed down in the Oral tradition and testimony of the Jewish people.These are just a few examples of the dozens throughout the Jewish scriptures that prove an additional oral instruction was given. One of the reasons for the lack of continuity around the 30,000 different arguing Christian denominations is because there is no Oral tradition.... each group makes up a new oral tradition as they split and go along. Every Jew, everywhere in the world wears the same phylacteries, the same fringes, slaughters an animal the same way (Kosher) because the Oral tradition has accompanied the written word just as Moses commanded."
10 Sarah R = "A fellow deily contributor pointed out to me recently that Gentiles were never required to follow the Jewish law. As most (though not all) Christians today are of "Gentile" (read: non-Jewish) heritage, we are not bound to follow the law, regardless of how we feel about it. However, I do think there is a great deal in the law and in the Old Testament in general which gives great guidance both to practical living and to our relationship to God. As Christians, we should embrace the Old Testament for what it can teach us about God and the kind of life that brings Him glory."
11 Sarah R = "There is a fundamental and important distinction here. This view suggests that God forgives because of what I do, that is, because of my regret, my confession, my redirecting my life. Christianity says God forgives because of what God does, that is, because of His love, His sacrifice, His redirecting of my life. Yes, I have the responsibility to come to Him, but it is only because of Him that I receive forgivessness."
12 Cary W = "Who among the living today, completely fulfill all the law and prophets?  I dare say there is not even one.  Therefore, in His foreknowledge that His laws keep exposing our erroneous ways, He then provides us a way out from the penalty of breaking His laws, so that with a clean, renewed heart and mind, we will see clearly and purely what please the Lord of Love and Righteousness."
13 Sarah R = "In ancient Rabbinic writings, the Rabbis tried to reconcile Messenic prophecies of a Messiah who would suffer and die with a Messiah who would reign. Some decided there must be two Messiahs - one who would come to suffer and die for the people, and one who would reign. Christians see these prophecies differently: One Messiah, who came to suffer, die and rise again, and who will return to reign, fulfilling the as of yet unfulfilled Old and New Testament prophecies of the united worship of God."
14 Sarah R = "I don't think this is a logical conclusion. Christianity after all started as a reform within Judaism. I think just because someone has a different view of things doesn't make them "bearing false witness" or lying. I don't think Muslims are bearing false witness because they believe in Muhammed (and also say that the Hebrew Scriptures point to Muhammed as the ultimate prophet), even though I do not. I just think they believe differently."
15 Cary W = "What if your assumption that we worship a multiple rather than singular Creator, then you do not understand the true teachings of Jesus.  The demons believe God is one and tremble.  Why?  Because He is one God, revealed through the man Christ Jesus, and extended to all who believe by His Spirit.  Whether I worship God, Jesus or the Spirit is inconsequential, for I worship one Lord and God.  Now, there are perhaps some Christians who are confused about the singular nature of our shared, one God, but I for one have never doubted that the God of the Jews and Jesus Christ are one and the same.  He is the Logos made flesh!"
16 Sarah R = "When God revealed Himself to the people, they were frightened and asked Moses to speak to Him alone. His greatness and might overwhelmed them. God then revealed Himself to all mankind by coming in the flesh, in human form, that the people would not be so overwhelmed, and would be able to talk to Him and see His face, to touch Him and eat with Him and walk with Him. While Jesus has now ascended to Heaven, we can still commune with God, as He is close to those who seek Him."