Donations recover at controversial Catholic charity

Fundraising for the flagship anti-poverty program of the U.S. Catholic bishops is slowly recovering after being battered by the recession … Continued

Fundraising for the flagship anti-poverty program of the U.S. Catholic bishops is slowly recovering after being battered by the recession and sharp attacks on its mission.

Officials at the Catholic Campaign for Human Development said that when 2012 collections are tallied after June 30, the program will match or slightly exceed last year’s mark of about $9.5 million. While that is still significantly down from the $12 million that the nationwide campaign was netting a few years ago, the upward trend is reassuring.

“We are pretty optimistic,” said Ralph McCloud, director of the CCHD. McCloud said he was still cautious, given the uncertain nature of the economy, but added that “if things keep going the way they have been, we could see a bit of an upswing.”

That would be good news for a program that in recent years has been known as much for controversy as it has for joining with other groups to fight endemic poverty — the reason it was created by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops in 1970.

A report from a progressive religious lobby, Faith in Public Life, earlier this month detailed efforts in recent years by conservative activists to try to undermine the CCHD by accusing the program of giving grants to groups whose members endorsed family planning policies or gay rights.

The report charged critics with practicing a guilt-by-association “Catholic McCarthyism.” The fact that more than 40 prominent bishops and other Catholic leaders endorsed the report was an indicator of how persistent attacks have frustrated the CCHD’s supporters.

A few dioceses, led by conservative bishops, halted the annual CCHD collections in some years and individual parishes also bypassed the collection that is the basis of the campaign’s fundraising.

The USCCB says it has investigated all the charges and found only rare lapses, and it has also tightened up its grant-making policies in order to reassure donors.

But the CCHD’s critics, led by the American Life League, a vocal anti-abortion group, say they are unconvinced and will keep up the pressure.

“CCHD grantees are indeed members of pro-abortion and pro-homosexual coalitions, and such membership is necessary to advance abortion and homosexuality in American society,” the ALL’s Michael Hichborn wrote in a rejoinder to the FPL report.

How much the attacks by ALL and an affiliated group, Reform CCHD Now, contributed to the decline in fundraising is difficult to assess, McCloud said.

Attacks on the CCHD were ramped up in 2009 following the election of Barack Obama as president, but they also coincided with the deepening recession, which hurt charitable donations across the board.

The criticism “may have had some part in the decline, but I think the fact that the CCHD is supported as well as it is means that it isn’t impacting it to a huge degree,” McCloud said.

Still, the nearly 20 percent decline in donations to the CCHD since 2007 appears to be significantly steeper than the average drop-off registered at all charities during the recession, and the rebound has so far not come close to compensating for the shortfall.

Moreover, collections to the Retirement Fund for Religious, which solicits donations to cover pension obligations for elderly nuns and brothers, did not suffer much of a decline during the recession. The collection for retired religious men and women took in $28.1 million in 2009, for example, and just over $29 million in 2012.

After the retired religious collection, the CCHD campaign is the largest national collection undertaken annually by the U.S. hierarchy.

Copyright: For copyright information, please check with the distributor of this item, Religion News Service LLC.

  • patsw

    If it has become “McCarthyism” to do screen captures of CCHD grantees who proudly display their affiliation to Planned Parenthood and other abortion advocates, then call me “Tail-Gunner Joe”.

    Catholics in the pews should not be asked, and bishops should not sponsor collections, which fund groups who advocate policies in opposition to Church teaching directly or through their federations or affiliations.

  • amelia45

    Many Catholics stopped contributing to Catholic Campaign for Human Development because of the gross interference by very conservative groups that undermined what Catholic charity is all about. Catholic extremists would seek to turn CCHD into an arm of their political fights. Some good programs have lost funding because a member of a board made a comment about gay marriage. Or because the organization belonged to an umbrella organization that did not condemn abortion – although none of the member organizations dealt with abortion.

    It is heartening to see that 40 bishops endorse CCHD and support fund raising. Let what happened when contributions dropped be a sign that CCHD represents all of us and not just those with a narrow view of what being Catholic means and not just particular issues.

  • chrisinwien

    Mr. Gibson supplies the dependably leftist view; in fact, forty years ago, the bishops turned away from true charity and embraced politics instead.

    That is the sad fact. No longer teaching sexual morality, the bishops went after government money and government approval.

    Look where it got us. Proud of yourselves, Your Excellencies?

    CCHD does not “fight poverty,” it gives our collection money to radical street fighters who follow Obama’s brand of neighborhood organizing.

    Again and again, CCHD is shocked, SHOCKED!! to discover that their grantees are left-wing pro-abortion political hacks whose idea of helping the poor is to organize the poor into a political bloc that serves the organizers, leaving the poor just as desperate as before.

    How did this happen?

    Most bishops grew up in Democrat families – back in the days when that meant pro-life, pro-family, pro-religious liberty Catholicism.

    But those bishops have been immersed in theology and ministry – so they insist on ignorantly playing politics, hiring “experts” who are uniformly of the Left and insulated from the people in the pews.

    Every year most bishops pledge reform of CCHD, and then beg for our money to “help the poor.”

    Is it a fraud? Do they know it is a fraud?.

    CCHD is emblematic of how the bishops conference has become politicized since the 1960s. It gets billions a year from the federal government, and lo! No bishop publicly tells Biden, Pelosi, Leahy, Durbin, and other prominent pro-abortion “Catholics” to cease their scandalous reception of the Eucharist.

    That’s the payoff.

    A few billion of government money a year: is that how much it takes to bribe the Church founded by Christ into silence?

    And then they have the gall to take up a collection so they can hire more political hacks — never telling the Faithful that they’ve already been neutered, paid off with billions in taxpayer money.

    Pray for the Church in the U.S.,, so poorly led.