To Thwart Anti-Woman Violence, President Jimmy Carter Calls for a Religious Power Shift

President Carter sends a message to world religious leaders: Stop using religion to justify violence against women.

If you are a male religious leader around the world, President Jimmy Carter has a very direct message for you: “Stop cherry-picking your sacred texts to justify the subjection of women and prop up male superiority.”

Carter says, “The presumption that men and boys are superior to women and girls . . . is supported by some male religious leaders who distort the Holy Bible, the Qu’ran, and other sacred texts to perpetuate their claim that females are, in some basic ways, inferior to them, unqualified to serve God on equal terms.”

This really has to stop, President Carter says, without equivocation, in his new book, A Call to Action: Women, Religion, Violence, and Power.

The president argues that this presumption of religious superiority on the part of men is the singular greatest factor in “perpetuating and expanding the trafficking in human slaves, body mutilation, and even legitimized murder on a massive scale.”’ Women are trafficked, enslaved, mutilated, raped and even legally murdered with the help of religion, even at the instruction of male-biased religious interpretation.

This book is not for the faint of heart. Carter covers deaths and injury to women in war, legal killing, rape, genocide of girls, slavery and prostitution, spouse abuse, honor killings, genital cutting, child marriage, dowry deaths, politics, unequal pay, and threats to maternal health. In every chapter, there is horrific detail — and also accounts of how women and male allies are working, sometimes with the very specific help of The Carter Center, to address this literal worldwide war on women’s bodies, minds and spirits.

The Carter Center has been addressing these issues for many years in its programs, but the question I asked myself many times in reading this book is, How does he know so many of the specifics that make up this perfect storm of violence against women?

An extraordinary thing about President Carter, and I speak from personal experience, is that he actually listens to women. When President Carter appeared on The Colbert Report recently, Colbert remarked to the president, “You’re not a Catholic yet.” Carter admitted as much, though allowed he was “thinking about it.” He said he could become a Catholic “[w]hen a female Catholic priest invites me to join her church.”

Note that while President Carter seems to think a lot of Pope Francis, he didn’t say he’d join the Catholic Church if the Pope asked him. No, he said he’s asking the Pope to ordain women, and then when the Catholic Church ordains women to be priests, he’d listen to a woman priest if she asked him to become a Catholic.

That’s pretty much how President Carter understands that last word in the title of his new book: power. There has to be a power shift in the relationship of men to women and a shift in how religion is deployed. Today, the president contends, religion is deployed to justify, even promote, violence against women.  That has to be reversed. Religion must be deployed to promote equal human rights and dignity for women.

One really interesting aspect of this book is the relationship of interpretation of sacred texts and violence against women. For President Carter, as a Protestant evangelical, the life and teachings of Jesus of Nazareth are the interpretive key to his own faith commitment to promoting women’s human rights. But as he articulates his views, I found them close to those of Rosemary Radford Ruether, who, in Sexism and Godtalk, states, ‘The critical principle of feminist theology is the promotion of the full humanity of women.  Whatever denies, diminishes or distorts the full humanity of women is, therefore, appraised as not redemptive.’” Ruether and Carter go about this very differently, of course, but I found there was a surprising overlap on this point.

Religion is a major source of power around the world, and Carter believes there needs to be a significant power shift in the way religion is interpreted regarding the full human rights and human dignity of women. All religions do have texts and teachings that can be deployed to support the full humanity of women, and religious leaders need to do that immediately.

I have worked for decades to confront religious justifications for violence against women and to promote Christian resources to help women who are being treated violently discover self-worth and their own agency. My work on this, especially “Every Two Minutes: Battered Women and Feminist Interpretation,” has been widely used for this purpose.

That article, as well as many other resources, was used at a 2013 forum held at the Carter Center, “Mobilizing Faith for Women: Engaging the Power of Religion and Belief to Advance Human Rights and Dignity.” Women and men from 15 countries around the world, including Iraq, Somalia, Liberia, Egypt, Senegal, Pakistan, Afghanistan, and The Democratic Republic of the Congo gathered for two days and presented and discussed a wide range of issues affecting the kinds of violence in their countries that was impeding women’s rights and dignity. We also discussed how to mobilize religious resources to stop these abuses and how to counter religious texts and interpretations used to justify a wide range of violence against women.

The photo above is from a panel presentation I did with President Carter, Dr. Samira Al-Alaani, who is a pediatrician at Fallujah General Hospital and who treats and researches birth defects brought on by the Iraq war, and Jeremy Courtney of the Preemptive Love Coalition, an organization that trains Iraqi doctors to treat heart defects in children, a terrible consequence of the conflict in Iraq. War kills and maims women and children at very high rates. In modern war, the vast majority of those injured and killed are noncombatants, mostly women and children. Modern war is really an extension of the war on women in a wide range of violations.

You can see President Carter, in the photo above, listening so intently to a conference attendee asking a question. It is an extraordinary feeling to have the 39th President of the United States listen to you, and to dozens of other women, and to the male participants, at the conference. (The new book contains many quotations from women and men who attended the conference.)

But the thing is, President Carter doesn’t just listen and then talk about problems. He acts. That is surely why the book is titled A Call to Action.

There is a way forward, and that way must include, as the conference title indicated, “mobilizing faith.” There are 18 different recommendations in the book. Some involve putting pressure on religious leaders to speak out against abuses of women, some involve international human rights work and national work to restrain war, end the death penalty, stop human trafficking, remove sexual harassment cases in the military from the chain of command, insist that the United States Senate ratify the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination and insist that the United States adopt the International Violence Against Women Act.

But the first one in the list is about listening to women and girls: “Encourage women and girls, including those not abused, to speak out more forcefully. It is imperative that those who do speak out are protected from retaliation.”

What all this means to me is that mobilizing faith to help end so many worldwide abuses against women will not work unless women themselves are heard in their own voices. This is, to me, a profound theological statement about how God works with the world.


Photo courtesy of Deborah Hakes/The Carter Center. 

  • Bev Murrill

    Fantastic article about a man of action. Thanks Susan. I am so heartened to read of your work and his as you go about seeking gender equality both in and outside of the church. This year I am intending to begin a PhD on the commodification of women and girls and the role patriarchy plays in that, and stumbling across you through this article is very encouraging to me. I will be looking at the work you have done. Thanks.

  • BM

    Why would any male or female want to be a RCC priest? Said religion will be extinct in 50 years. The reasons: Severely flawed theology and history and the pedophilia abomination.

  • BM

    Some added specifics that Jimmy should have noted:

    Islam gives women almost no rights and treats them like fodder for the male species as so bluntly noted by Aya-an Hi-rsi Ali in her autobiography, In-fidel.

    “Thus begins the extraordinary story of a woman born into a family of desert nomads, circu-mcised as a child, educated by radical imams in Kenya and Saudi Arabia, taught to believe that if she uncovered her hair, terrible tragedies would ensue. It’s a story that, with a few different twists, really could have led to a wretched life and a lonely death, as her grandmother warned. But instead, Hi-rsi Ali escaped – and transformed herself into an internationally renowned spokeswoman for the rights of Muslim women.”
    ref: Washington Post book review.

    some excerpts:

    “Some of the Saudi women in our neighborhood were regularly be-aten by their husbands. You could hear them at night. Their scre-ams resounded across the courtyards. “No! Please! By Allah!”

    “The Pakistanis were Muslims but they too had cas-tes. The Untou-chable girls, both Indian and Pakistani were darker skin. The others would not play with them because they were unt-ouchable. We thought that was funny because of course they were tou-chable: we to-uched them see? but also hor-rifying to think of yourself as un-touchable, des-picable to the human race.”

    “Between October 2004 and May 2005, eleven Muslim girls were ki-lled by their families in just two regions (there are 20 regions in Holland). After that, people stopped telling me I was exa-ggerating.”

    “The kind on thinking I saw in Saudi Arabia and among the Brotherhood of Kenya and Som-alia, is incompatible with human rights and liberal values. It preserves the feu-dal mind-set based on tr-ibal concepts of honor and shame. It rests on self-deception, hypro-cricy, and double standards. It relies on the technologial advances of the West while pretending to ignore their origin in Western thinking. This mind-set makes the transition to modernity very painful for all who practice Islam”.