If Gay Marriage Is Legalized in 2015, How Will Evangelicals Respond?

Progressives may have the momentum, but conservatives still have a majority.

Ten years after Massachusetts became the first state to allow same-sex marriage, gay and lesbian Americans can be wed in 35 states and the District of Columbia (Florida will boost that number to 36, starting Tuesday). This year, the Supreme Court may put an end to the skirmish by legalizing what progressives call “equality” and conservatives dub a “redefinition” of this cherished social institution.

The court last ruled on gay marriage in 2013 when the justices gutted much of the federal Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. Windsor and delivered a massive blow to anti-gay marriage advocates. Since then, the court has acted by not acting — in effect, doubling the number of states where gay marriage is legal, from 17 to 35, by refusing to hear a slew of appeals last year.

In November, the Cincinnati-based 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld gay marriage bans in four states, which will almost certainly require the high court to decide the issue once and for all.

Conservative Christians have been among the most ardent opponents of gay marriage and rights for decades. How will they respond if the Supreme Court makes gay marriage legal nationwide?

The answer, it turns out, depends on which Christian you’re speaking to.

Russell Moore, president of the Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission of the Southern Baptist Convention, has become a leading face for the next generation of Christians opposed to gay marriage. He expects the court to take up marriage this year, and is not optimistic about how they’ll rule given the Windsor decision.

Even so, he doesn’t think such a ruling will make a whit of difference for most of his fellow evangelicals.

“Evangelicals are, by definition, defined around the Bible and the gospel,” Moore said. “The Scriptures are clear on what marriage is, and clear on the sin of sexual expression outside of the marriage covenant of a man and woman.”

If the court were to “redefine marriage,” Moore said Christians should “be ready to offer an alternative vision of marriage and family” that doesn’t include same-sex unions. Interestingly, his vision would be promoted primarily within the church rather than changing laws through political action.

“We must articulate these truths about marriage in our gospel witness, and we must embody these truths in churches that take marriage seriously,” Moore said. “This means we must start teaching our children a countercultural word about what it means to be men and women, about what marriage is, and that must begin not in premarital counseling but in children’s Sunday school.”

He contends that anyone who supports gay marriage is not an evangelical.

Ryan Anderson, a fellow at the Heritage Foundation who co-authored What is Marriage? with Princeton scholar Robert P. George, is a powerful voice among young conservatives. Anderson thinks the court is “very likely” to take up same-sex marriage in 2015 given the 6th Circuit decision, and he believes the decision will come down to Justice Anthony Kennedy, who has authored the court’s most significant gay rights decisions.

Anderson (a Roman Catholic, like Kennedy) said the majority of evangelicals will remain opposed to gay marriage regardless of the ruling. But he believes the law can serve a “pedagogical function,” so legalizing gay marriage could “change the public understanding of behavior.” While Anderson won’t predict how conservative Christians at large would react, he said much depends on the behavior of LGBT advocates.

“We’ll have to see how gracious or vindictive voices within the LGBT community are in their responses,” Anderson said. “Will they become a live-and-let-live movement or a stamp-out-dissent movement? If there’s respect, there’s likely to be less pushback from conservatives.”

Anderson and Moore represent a sizable chunk of the Christian population — a majority of evangelicals and half of practicing Catholics oppose gay marriage — but they are not all of it. In recent years, many Christians, particularly younger Christians, have changed their minds on the matter. From 2003 to 2013, support for gay marriage among white evangelicals more than doubled, and support among Catholics rose by 22 percentage points.

Brandan Robertson, national spokesman for the group Evangelicals for Marriage Equality, an organization that believes “you can be a devout, Bible-believing evangelical and support the right of same-sex couples to be recognized by the government as married,” also believes the court will take up the issue this year.

“Christians are increasingly saying that they need to stand up for LGBT equality no matter what they believe theologically,” he said, “and they are doing this not because they are American, but because they are followers of Christ.”

Though Robertson is strident in his support of “marriage equality,” he shies away from addressing whether homosexual behavior is moral, or sinful — representing many Christians who draw a distinction between civil marriage and Christian marriage.

Justin Lee, executive director of the Gay Christian Network and author of Torn: Rescuing the Gospel from the Gays-vs.-Christians Debate, believes a Supreme Court decision in favor of gay marriage is inevitable. While his organization seeks to welcome Christians from a range of perspectives, his comments about marriage mirror Robertson’s.

“There is a distinction between Christian marriage in the eyes of God and civil marriage in the eyes of the state,” Lee said. “My hope is that Christians will continue to see that what the state says marriage is may not line up with what the church or God says.”

Conservatives are changing their minds, albeit slowly, about homosexuality, but are shifting more rapidly on gay marriage.

Even though about half of conservative Christians now believe that gay marriage is inevitable, don’t expect them to slip quietly into the night. Progressives may have the momentum, but conservatives still have a majority. Look to evangelicals to shore up the theology around holy matrimony, and fight to defend their religious liberty rights to oppose same-sex marriage.

“A Supreme Court ruling might be the last word in legal terms,” Moore said, “but it is hardly the last word in cultural or spiritual terms.”

Image courtesy of Victoria Pickering.

  • Carstonio

    Either Anderson is offering a more polite version of the usual demagoguery, or he honestly doesn’t understand the concept of the secular. That would be almost funny if people like him and Moore weren’t advocating for legal discrimination based on sexual orientation. Not surprising that he would ally with George, whose arguments before the Supreme Court were essentially poorly secularized versions of Catholic teachings.

    Pedagogical? I hope Anderson doesn’t seriously believe that people turn gay simply because the government doesn’t tell them no. And he represents a movement has long rejected live-and-let-live regarding orientation, and has long practiced stamping out dissent by seeing to keep gays in the closet. It’s not repression to point out that no one has any business deciding who other consenting adults should or shouldn’t marry. And it’s not repression to stigmatize the political position that laws should discriminate against gays.

    Robertson and Lee have the right idea, but even they seem to assume that Christian teachings about sexuality apply to everyone and not to Christians only. That would be like the Amish expecting everyone to give up modern technology or Jewish people lambasting Christians for not keeping kosher. If you believe that it would go against your conscience to be gay, that applies only to you. Marriage equality means not just the freedom to pursue legal marriage with a spouse of the same sex, but also the freedom not to do so. No one’s “religious liberty” is being threatened, and that’s a sickening argument coming from people who have worked to deny liberty to others.

  • Keith Babberney

    why aren’t these people picketing Red Lobster? There is just as much evidence that God hates lobster eaters and the Bible talks about similar punishments for doing so. These people are not upholding their religious beliefs. They are cravenly hiding behind God as an excuse to push their bigotry (just as slaveholders did, just as anti-abolitionists did, just as Jim Crow Klan members did). I wonder which of these sins God will decide to punish most?

    • bakabomb

      I doubt they have Red Lobster in those parts. Red Crawdaddy, more likely.

  • Miles Quatermass

    “We’ll have to see how gracious or vindictive voices within the LGBT
    community are in their responses,” Anderson said. “Will they become a
    live-and-let-live movement or a stamp-out-dissent movement?”
    Oh, the irony!

  • bakabomb

    “[Moore] contends that anyone who supports gay marriage is not an evangelical.”

    He needs to go back and check his definitions. He might have a point if he claims any “fundamentalist” who supports gay marriage isn’t a “fundamentalist”. But evangelicals (and charismatics) aren’t bound by any such inherent prohibition.

  • Donalbain

    How about this? Those of us who believe in equality of marriage rights promise not to try to pass laws banning Christian from marrying. We promise not to try to pass laws that make it legal to refuse someone service because they are Christian. We promise not to try to pass laws making it illegal for Christians to adopt children.

    That is more than the bigots ever agreed to do for gay people.

  • Carstonio

    If folks like Anderson and Moore stated that legalized same-sex marriage is bad for society, and offered secular arguments in good faith, I would at least listen even though I would disagree. But their arguments are exclusively sectarian, which is the textbook example of pushing their religion on others – their arguments have interior logic only if one accepts the assumptions built into their theology.

    And at least in this article, they’re not acting as if society is in any peril. That ought to make it more obvious that the Chicken Little hysteria of groups like NOM is a pretense. There’s a theory that their target audience genuinely believes that the Christian god will punish all of America for accepting homosexuality, and that these folks fear becoming collateral damage. That might explain “I am afraid” in the infamous NOM video.

  • cwayneu

    Any religion that requires discrimination is a social cancer. Islam is obviously in that camp, but so is Christianity. They may not chop off peoples heads, but if truly following the Bible would certainly be stoning a bunch of people to death. Here in Indiana were religion lost the same sex marriage ban, they are now proposing legislation that would give businesses the right to discriminate based on religious beliefs. These efforts just continue to foster bigotry and animosity.